The Houston Astros have a problem that looks good on paper but gets ugly fast in real life: their infield is overcrowded, and the roster construction for 2026 is starting to force a decision.
Charros de Jalisco v Naranjeros de Hermosillo – Game 2 Mexican Pacific League | Norte Photo/GettyImages
Houston has made it clear through its own comments and lineup planning that someone has to go. The defensive limitations are real, the playing time math doesn’t work cleanly, and the payroll isn’t exactly flexible enough to keep everyone just because they can.
That’s why one name keeps surfacing as the likely trade candidate:
Isaac Paredes.
It’s not because the Astros want to move him. It’s because moving him might be the cleanest way to clear space, reshape the roster, and still get something meaningful back.
Why Paredes is the “easy” trade chip — even if Houston doesn’t love it
Let’s be honest: if Houston could wave a wand and trade away a contract they don’t love while keeping all their best assets, they would.
That’s why some fans have assumed the Astros would prefer to move Christian Walker instead.
But the harsh reality is simple: Paredes has value.
He’s under team control through 2027, and even though his 2025 season got knocked off course by a hamstring injury, he was playing well before that. He’s the kind of player who can still headline a deal without Houston needing to attach extra incentives.
If the Astros want to clear space and get a return, Paredes is the most realistic path.
The problem: the internet is now “building trades” like it’s a video game
As soon as Paredes became the trendy trade name, the trade machine content started flying.
Bleacher Report’s Kerry Miller recently ran a trade exercise using Baseball Trade Values, a site that spits out “fair” trade packages using a model.
And this is where things go sideways — because one of the Paredes proposals that came out of that process is the perfect example of why fans should stop trusting trade generators like they’re gospel.
The trade package that makes absolutely no sense
Here’s the deal that got floated as a “possible” framework:
Astros send:
- Isaac Paredes
- Bryan Abreu (arguably their second-best reliever)
- Brice Matthews (top prospect)
Red Sox send:
- Wilyer Abreu
That’s it.
One player back.
Even if you’re someone who likes Wilyer Abreu — and plenty of people do — the idea that Houston would send a controllable everyday infielder, a premium leverage reliever, and a top prospect… for one outfielder is borderline comedic.
Not because Abreu is bad.
But because that’s not a trade. That’s a robbery.
And what makes it worse is the comparison nobody wants to say out loud:
If Houston wants a glove-first outfielder with modest offensive value, they already have Jake Meyers without having to set their roster on fire.
Why trade generators keep failing the same way
This is the part most fans learn the hard way: these trade engines don’t handle reality.
They handle numbers.
And baseball trades aren’t just numbers.
They’re built on things like:
- who is actually available
- who fits the roster
- options and flexibility
- clubhouse and usage
- playoff value vs regular season value
- financial obligations
- whether money is included
- what the market looks like in that moment
Trade generators struggle with all of that — especially the money part.
Because in real MLB trades, cash is often the difference between “no chance” and “done deal.”
If Houston were truly trading Paredes, Abreu, and Matthews in one package, the only way it even becomes remotely logical is if Boston is taking on a financial burden Houston is desperate to dump — and even then, it would require more than a single outfielder coming back.
Yes, Houston and Boston could match up… just not like this
A Paredes-to-Boston concept isn’t crazy.
Boston could use infield help. Houston could use outfield stability. There’s a framework where both teams benefit.
But the version that gets generated online removes every ounce of nuance and replaces it with one ugly truth:
the model doesn’t understand leverage, context, or consequence.
So it creates “fair value” deals that would never survive an actual phone call between front offices.
The real lesson for Astros fans
This isn’t about dunking on one writer or one website.
It’s about the bigger point:
Trade generators are fun.
They create discussion.
They fill content gaps.
But they’re not reality.
And when the Astros eventually do make a move — whether it’s Paredes or someone else — it’s going to look a lot more complicated, a lot more expensive, and a lot more human than any calculator on the internet is willing to admit.
Leave a Reply