The timing is what made people stop scrolling.
Within days of Mookie Betts publicly acknowledging he plans to retire when his Dodgers contract ends, another headline landed quietlyâbut carried far bigger implications. Elly De La Cruz, just 24 years old, turned down a contract extension that would have made him the highest-paid player in Cincinnati Reds history.
Those two facts didnât need to be connected.
Fans connected them anyway.
De La Cruzâs rejectionâreportedly surpassing Joey Vottoâs landmark dealâwasnât just a financial decision. It was a signal. And when a Scott Boras client sends a signal, the league listens.
Boras didnât offer timelines. De La Cruz didnât make demands. But the subtext was unmistakable: patience has value, leverage grows with time, and elite talent doesnât rush into permanenceâespecially when the sportâs biggest spenders are always watching.
Thatâs where the Dodgers enter the frame.
Los Angeles has never hidden its preference for elite, multi-tool stars who can anchor premium positions for a decade. With Bettsâ long-term runway now publicly defined, the Dodgersâ future needs became easier to project. Shortstop is one of them. De La Cruzâpower, speed, arm strength, highlight-level athleticismâfits the profile almost too cleanly.
But hereâs the twist: Toronto may be the team best positioned to disrupt that plan.
The Blue Jays are suddenly short a long-term answer at shortstop after Bo Bichette declined a qualifying offer and signed elsewhere. That vacancy isnât theoretical. Itâs immediate. And unlike many contenders, Toronto has shown a willingness to pay for elite position playersâand to move aggressively when opportunity presents itself.
De La Cruzâs rĂ©sumĂ© explains the buzz. In 2025, he hit 22 home runs, drove in 86, and stole 37 bases. His sprint speed sits among the leagueâs elite, his exit velocities excite evaluators, and his age aligns perfectly with a multi-year build. Heâs also under team control for years, which keeps this conversation in the realm of strategy rather than urgency.
Thatâs what makes the moment uncomfortable for Cincinnati.
The Reds did what small- to mid-market teams are told to do: identify the cornerstone early and try to lock him up. De La Cruzâs ânoâ doesnât mean he wants outâbut it does mean the leverage clock keeps ticking. And every year that passes without an extension increases the volume of outside noise.
For Toronto, the argument is simple and risky at the same time.
A bold move nowâtrade or long-term courtshipâcould secure a franchise shortstop and simultaneously prevent the Dodgers from executing another long-game acquisition. Torontoâs payroll flexibility and recent behavior suggest they wouldnât be scared by the price. The question is whether theyâre willing to act before speculation hardens into inevitability.
Because inevitability is how Dodgers rumors usually end.
Still, itâs crucial to separate heat from fire. There is no official indication De La Cruz plans to leave Cincinnati before free agency. No trade request. No public dissatisfaction. Team control runs through at least the 2029 offseason. Everything else is inferenceâpowered by market history, agent patterns, and the gravitational pull of L.A.
That said, baseball decisions are often made long before announcements.
De La Cruzâs home/road splits hint at adaptability. His tools suggest scalability. His age invites patience. For front offices, thatâs the holy trinity. And when those boxes are checked, the conversation doesnât fadeâit matures.
Toronto now stands at an awkward crossroads. Do they wait and risk watching the Dodgers slowly shape the narrative? Or do they test the market early, when leverage is still fluid and the message can be reframed as ambition rather than reaction?
One rejected deal doesnât force a move.
But it changes the board.
And in a league where timing is currency, the next decisionâby Cincinnati, Toronto, or Los Angelesâmay quietly decide who controls the next decade at shortstop.
Leave a Reply