At the time, it felt bold.
Risky, even. The Dodgers were already contenders when they pulled the trigger on the Mookie Betts trade in February 2020, and some wondered whether giving up young pieces for a superstar with contract uncertainty was worth it.
Six years later, the question feels almost naĆÆve.

What once looked like an aggressive win-now move has aged into something far more consequential. The Betts trade didnāt just improve the Dodgersāit redefined them.
Since arriving in Los Angeles, Betts has become the quiet backbone of the franchiseās most dominant stretch in modern history. Three World Series titles.
Four All-Star selections. Four Silver Sluggers. Two Gold Gloves. Numbers that read like a Hall of Fame rƩsumƩ compressed into half a decade.

But the statistics only tell part of the story.
Betts didnāt simply arrive and performāhe adapted. He reshaped himself to fit what the Dodgers needed, not what was comfortable.
Moving off his preferred right field position, he transitioned into an elite shortstop role with the same precision and competitiveness that defined his outfield play.
That willingness to sacrifice status for structure set a tone that echoed through the clubhouse.
Leadership without speeches. Impact without ego.

On the field, Betts has been relentlessly consistent. A .867 OPS in a Dodgers uniform. One hundred fifty-two home runs. Four hundred forty-three RBIs.
At least 4.0 bWAR every season since 2020, including leading all of MLB during the shortened championship year.
Off the field, his presence settled something harder to quantify.
The Dodgers didnāt just acquire productionāthey acquired stability. In an era of constant roster churn and superstar volatility, Betts became a fixed point.
A player others could orbit around. A standard against which effort and professionalism were quietly measured.

Meanwhile, the other side of the trade tells a different story.
David Price contributed solidly before retiring, but his role was always secondary to the dealās true purpose.
Alex Verdugo delivered league-average production before slipping out of relevance. Connor Wong remains a serviceable catcher, steady but unspectacular. Jeter Downs never found footing in the majors.
None of that makes them failuresābut it does highlight the imbalance.
The Dodgers didnāt just get the best player in the deal. They got the only one who shaped outcomes at the highest level.
What makes the trade feel even more defining now is how seamlessly it aligned with everything that followed. Championships didnāt feel accidental.
They felt structured. Betts didnāt dominate every headlineābut he was present in every winning equation.
Even as the roster evolved around himānew stars arriving, eras overlappingāBetts remained constant. Not loud. Not demanding. Just relentlessly effective.

Thatās why, six years later, this trade feels less like a transaction and more like a philosophical shift.
The Dodgers didnāt just prioritize talent. They prioritized adaptability, accountability, and durability. Betts embodied all three. And in doing so, he helped anchor a period of sustained excellence that many franchises chase but few achieve.
Looking back, itās not just that the Dodgers āwonā the trade.
Itās that they understood something early: championships arenāt built solely on star powerātheyāre built on players who make everything around them work better.
Mookie Betts did that quietly. Repeatedly. Consistently.
And six years on, as banners hang and eras blur together, the trade no longer feels like a gamble at all.
It feels like the moment the Dodgers decided exactly who they wanted to be.
Leave a Reply