Last fall, Trey Yesavage emerged as a reminder that sometimes, the path from draft to the big stage can be incredibly short. Called up in mid-September, the Toronto Blue Jays rookie didn’t just “taste” MLB — he made the World Series and looked completely out of sync.
Therefore, when MLB Network asked: Who could be the next Trey Yesavage? — the answer wasn’t simply a prediction. It was a scenario.
Jonathan Mayo didn’t hesitate to name Jamie Arnold of the Oakland A’s.
At this point, Arnold hasn’t even made his professional debut yet. Selected 11th in the 2025 draft, he enters 2026 as a consensus top-100 prospect — and one of the rare shooters considered “potentially ready sooner than expected.”
According to Mayo, the surprise wasn’t his talent, but the fact that Arnold… dropped to pick 11. His college record at Florida State was one of the most consistent in the draft class. 2025 had its ups and downs, but how he finished the season changed everything.
More importantly, Arnold wasn’t just “stuff.”
His fastball could reach the upper-90s. His slider was considered one of the best breaking pitches in the entire draft class—sharp enough to take down big-league hitters right now. His change-up was far more complete than a prospect fresh out of college. And on the mound, Arnold had something teams always look for but are hard to quantify: competitiveness.
But talent alone wasn’t enough to create a “Yesavage scenario.”
The other part was the circumstances—and this is where A’s started to become noteworthy.
Mayo called Oakland “sneaky good.” A young, relatively unknown team, but with enough offensive talent to make management consider accelerating progress. If the A’s are still close to the AL West race mid-season, the logic will change. Long-term development gives way to short-term opportunities.
And that’s the moment Jamie Arnold could be named.
Like Toronto last year, Oakland enters 2026 with a big question mark over pitching. Rotation isn’t lacking in effort, but it lacks a clear foundation. What makes fans optimistic isn’t what’s already happened—but what could happen.
Arnold is the clearest representative of that belief.
Of course, this is still just a hypothesis. Not every top prospect can replicate Yesavage’s journey. MLB rarely follows a perfect script. But what makes this story noteworthy is: it no longer sounds too far-fetched.
The A’s don’t hide the fact they’re willing to accelerate their roadmap if circumstances allow. Arnold isn’t the kind of pitcher who needs a long “nurtured” period. And Sacramento, for the first time in years, can enter the season feeling that the postseason isn’t just a pipe dream.
If that happens, Jamie Arnold won’t be called up as a prospect. He’ll be called up as a temporary solution to an unsolved problem.
The only question remaining is: will 2026 be the year the A’s are forced to try—or will everything stop before the Trey Yesavage scenario is rewritten?
Leave a Reply