
For nearly two years, the WNBA universe fought the wrong war.
Fans battled on social media, analysts screamed into microphones, and entire media personalities staked their reputations on one âunfair injusticeâ: Aâja Wilson deserved a signature shoe before Caitlin Clark â and Nike was the villain who refused to give it to her.
But now?
That entire narrative has collapsed â because Aâja Wilson herself revealed she had her shoe deal locked in YEARS before the outrage ever began.
And the WNBA media?
They werenât just wrong. They misled millions.
A Lie That Spiraled Across the League
For years, commentators blasted Nike as âracist,â âbiased,â and âdisrespectfulâ toward Aâja Wilson.
You probably remember it â the think-pieces, the outrage, the forced narratives:
âHow dare they give Caitlin Clark a deal before Aâja Wilson?â
âAâja is a two-time MVP â where is her shoe?â
âCaitlin is benefiting from privilege!â
Some media members built entire identities around this crusade.
But thanks to a viral tweet by EP â and a resurfaced video â the truth is now undeniable:
Aâja Wilson had her Nike shoe deal for two years.
She wasnât being ignored.
She wasnât being mistreated.
She wasnât being âsnubbedâ in favor of Caitlin Clark.
She was already designing her sneaker in secret.
The WNBA media wasnât defending Aâja.
They were using her.
The Moment Aâja Accidentally Exposed the Truth
In a clip that is now blowing up the internet, Aâja casually explains how her family reacted when she first showed them the shoe â long before fans ever heard about it:
âI showed it to them maybe a day before my jersey retirement⌠they were stunned⌠my dad was holding back tearsâŚâ
Her shoe existed.
Her family had pairs.
Her father already wanted the other colorways.
And this wasnât last week.
This wasnât last month.
This was YEARS ago.
Meanwhile, the WNBA media kept painting Caitlin Clark as the villain â the newcomer who somehow âstoleâ an opportunity from Aâja.
But Aâja?
She knew the truth the entire time.
Nikeâs Complicated Weekend
Nike has been in the storm for days â Super Bowl commercials, edited ads, controversies about Caitlin Clarkâs appearance and her missing segments.
The brand canât escape criticism right now.
But this revelation cuts deeper.
Nike wasnât publicly disrespecting Aâja Wilson.
They were already planning her shoe â quietly, carefully, privately â building an entire line, not just one sneaker.
And while fans attacked Caitlin Clark for her $28 million dealâŚ
While media pushed the narrative that Aâja was âignoredââŚ
While analysts accused the brand of racismâŚ
Aâja was attending design meetings.
Aâja was selecting colorways.
Aâja was planning her launch.
This bombshell didnât just burn Nike â it obliterated the credibility of the loudest WNBA commentators.
The Moment Cheryl Swoopes Spoke â and the Internet Cracked
During Aâjaâs shoe event, WNBA legend Cheryl Swoopes delivered an emotional speech, praising Aâja and celebrating another Black woman receiving her own signature sneaker.
But embedded inside her speech was something no one expected:
Cheryl admitted she didnât call Aâja when the shoe news came out because the moment felt too overwhelming.
She described the history, her own legacy, the milestones, the cultural significance.
But what she didnât know â and what the internet cannot un-hear â is that:
This âhistoric momentâ had actually been decided years earlier.

The stunned crowd didnât know.
Cheryl didnât know.
The fans didnât know.
But Aâja did.
The Fallout: WNBA Media Exposed
This story isnât just about Nike.
It isnât just about Aâja Wilson.
It isnât even about Caitlin Clark.
This is about trust â and how badly the WNBA media broke it.
For two years:
- They attacked Nike for discrimination.
- They painted Caitlin Clark as the reason Aâja wasnât getting her shoe.
- They used the controversy to stir outrage, clicks, and division.
But the truth was simple:
Aâja had her deal.
She just wasnât allowed to tell anyone.
And the WNBA media â instead of verifying facts â built an entire culture war around fiction.
The Caitlin Clark Angle

The saddest part?
Caitlin Clark became the punching bag for a situation she had nothing to do with.
She didnât block Aâja Wilsonâs shoe.
She didnât steal a contract.
She didnât benefit from Nike choosing her âoverâ someone else.
Yet she was harassed, criticized, and dragged for months â by people who are now silent.
The Bigger Picture: Aâja Wilson Didnât Lie â But She Didnât Correct the Lie Either
Aâja never publicly denied the outrage.
She never clarified that she already knew about her deal.
Was she under NDA?
Probably.
But the end result is the same:
The media screamed âInjustice!â while Aâja was smiling in secret sneaker meetings.
Fans were misled.
Caitlin was targeted.
Nike was attacked.
And the WNBAâs credibility took another hit.
This wasnât a misunderstanding.
This was a two-year misinformation campaign.
And it finally exploded.
Leave a Reply