Meghan Markle has long been a figure of fascination and controversy. While some view her as a beacon of authenticity and empowerment, others, including broadcaster Meghan Kelly, are determined to pierce the carefully constructed image that the Duchess of Sussex has worked tirelessly to maintain. Kelly’s recent comments have stirred the internet, leaving many divided and others feeling vindicated. In her sharp critiques, Kelly has not only called Meghan a “malignant narcissist” but has also suggested that the Duchess’s rise to royal status was meticulously orchestrated rather than a serendipitous fairytale.
Kelly’s criticism began with a viral video, where she accused Meghan of marrying Prince Harry for money, claiming the Duchess had been after him long before the two were publicly seen together. According to Kelly, Meghan had strategically set her sights on Harry, even creating a “vision board” with his picture years before their relationship became public knowledge. For Kelly, this wasn’t a love story but a calculated move to secure a royal title and the associated perks. She further characterized Meghan as shallow and calculating, even mocking her for forgetting her children’s birthdays, which was, according to Kelly, a sign of vanity and self-absorption.
The remarks were bold, direct, and harsh, stirring a wave of reactions online. Meghan’s supporters were quick to condemn Kelly’s commentary, accusing her of being unnecessarily cruel and invasive. However, many others felt that Kelly was simply voicing what they had suspected for years but were too hesitant to say aloud. What made Kelly’s words sting more than your average critique was their alignment with long-held suspicions about Meghan’s character, her ambitions, and the public image she’s carefully curated. Kelly’s claims struck a chord with many who see Meghan not as a victim of circumstance but as a master manipulator who controls her narrative with ruthless precision.
One of Kelly’s most jarring assertions was that Meghan married Harry for status and wealth. According to Kelly, Meghan “bagged the elephant”—a metaphor for Harry’s royal status—indicating that Meghan’s romantic pursuit was far more strategic than any fairy tale narrative. Kelly even suggested that Meghan’s actions were planned years in advance, long before she met Harry. This idea of Meghan as a calculated, ambitious woman rather than a love-struck actress struck many as devastating, especially those who believed in the authenticity of Meghan’s public persona.
Kelly’s criticisms didn’t stop there. In another segment, she compared Meghan to Chrissy Teigen, accusing both women of forgetting their children’s birthdays. Kelly’s jab implied that Meghan was too self-centered and concerned with her image to focus on the basic responsibilities of motherhood. To Kelly, this wasn’t just about one-off mistakes but a deeper character flaw: a person obsessed with fame and status, willing to sacrifice personal connections for public image.
While Kelly’s bluntness may have struck a nerve, it resonated with a significant portion of her audience. Kelly’s approach to exposing what she sees as Meghan’s duplicity aligns with the public’s increasing weariness of carefully polished public images and PR spin. As audiences crave rawness and honesty, Kelly’s willingness to dissect Meghan’s background and public narrative made her comments all the more compelling.
One of the key elements of Kelly’s criticism involves Meghan’s age and the rumors that have long surrounded it. Officially, Meghan was born on August 4, 1981, making her 44 years old in 2025. However, skeptics have pointed to various discrepancies in Meghan’s public appearances and the people around her. A group photo from Northwestern University’s Salsa Club, in which Meghan appeared to be almost the same age as her friends, raised suspicions that she might actually be older than she claims. This inconsistency has fueled theories that Meghan may have intentionally shortened her age to present a more marketable, youthful image—a common practice in Hollywood but a potentially dangerous one for someone in her position.
Kelly seized upon these age rumors, reinforcing the idea that Meghan’s public persona is not one of spontaneous authenticity but one meticulously crafted and edited over time. The notion that Meghan altered her birth year to maintain a more youthful image adds a layer of suspicion to her carefully constructed brand.
Another significant element of Kelly’s critique centers around the modification of Meghan’s birth certificate after the birth of her son, Archie, in 2019. Initially, the document included Meghan’s full name, “Rachel Meghan Markle,” as is customary. However, just weeks later, the birth certificate was changed to omit her first name, leaving only her royal title, “Her Royal Highness, the Duchess of Sussex.” Critics of Meghan’s decision to alter the certificate see it as a red flag. Why would Meghan, someone who built her public image on sincerity and transparency, alter such an important document? Kelly’s criticism implied that it was yet another attempt to control the narrative and erase any trace of her past before becoming a duchess.
Kelly’s analysis of Meghan’s selective sharing of personal photos, family history, and documents adds another layer of suspicion. Many have noticed that Meghan’s past often seems edited, with photos and records resurfacing at strategic moments before disappearing again. This curated timeline, according to Kelly, is not the work of a woman genuinely documenting her life but of someone carefully managing the narrative to fit a particular image. The birth certificate change, the age rumors, and the selective sharing of images all point to a woman meticulously editing her story.
Critics of Meghan have long questioned her authenticity, and Kelly’s recent remarks provide a fresh wave of ammunition. For Meghan’s defenders, these allegations are invasive and cruel, a form of bullying that goes beyond mere critique. But for those who have long been skeptical of Meghan’s persona, Kelly’s words feel like an unvarnished truth, one that exposes the gaps in Meghan’s carefully constructed image.
The backlash against Kelly’s comments has been intense, but the broadcaster’s willingness to speak harshly and without apology has struck a chord with her audience. Kelly doesn’t shy away from difficult truths or controversial statements, and in today’s media landscape, where polished public relations efforts dominate, her raw candor provides a refreshing contrast. Whether or not one agrees with Kelly’s views, her voice is impossible to ignore. And for Meghan Markle, each of Kelly’s statements only serves to amplify the fractures in her carefully crafted story, leaving the world to wonder: how much of Meghan’s narrative is real, and how much is just another well-executed act?
Leave a Reply