Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, the daughters of Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew, have long been the subject of public speculation about whether they would eventually take on the role of “working royals.” Their close ties to the late Queen Elizabeth II and the royal family’s ongoing evolution have sparked ongoing debates about their future in the monarchy. However, recent events and longstanding royal dynamics suggest that a public royal role for the two sisters was never truly on the horizon—and it’s not simply because of their mother’s latest controversy.
The controversy surrounding Sarah Ferguson, particularly her resurfaced connections to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, has undeniably reignited the discussion about Beatrice and Eugenie’s place within the royal family. An email from Ferguson, in which she described Epstein as a “steadfast, generous and supreme friend” while publicly pledging to cut ties with him, has led to further scrutiny of the family’s reputation. At least seven prominent charities, including the Teenage Cancer Trust and the British Heart Foundation, have severed their ties with the Duchess, further complicating her standing within royal circles. But while Ferguson’s actions have certainly cast a shadow over her daughters, the reality is that their future roles within the royal family were likely decided long before this scandal emerged.
For years, King Charles III has been clear about his vision for the future of the monarchy. His desire to “slim down” the royal family and focus on a smaller group of working royals has been a central tenet of his approach. Charles grew up in a royal world where family representation was often bloated, with numerous cousins and extended family members involved in royal duties, leading to crowded public events and ceremonies. His goal, once he ascended the throne, was to streamline the monarchy and ensure that the spotlight remained firmly on the core royal family.
This shift in focus was evident even during Queen Elizabeth II’s Diamond Jubilee celebrations in 2012. While the occasion was a celebration of the Queen’s reign, it also signaled the future of the monarchy under Charles. The core group of royals—Charles, Camilla, William, Kate, and Harry—was clearly at the forefront, with extended family members notably absent from the proceedings. This moment was widely interpreted as a nod to the changes Charles had envisioned for the royal family. As the current monarch, he has continued to maintain this approach, ensuring that royal engagements are primarily managed by a select few.
The winds of change are expected to continue under Prince William, who is poised to inherit the throne in the future. Reports suggest that he shares his father’s vision for a leaner, more focused royal family, with an emphasis on addressing significant global issues. This vision has reportedly led to some tensions, particularly with Princess Anne, who has long been known for her commitment to a full schedule of royal duties. If Prince William is willing to alter the traditional royal framework to better suit the future of the monarchy, it would come at the expense of expanding the roster of working royals.
The reality is that both Beatrice and Eugenie were never truly in line for public royal roles. While their royal lineage and connection to the Queen may have generated expectations, the monarchy’s evolution in recent decades has made it increasingly unlikely that the daughters of Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew would be called upon to serve as working royals. King Charles’s desire to centralize royal duties among a core group, along with Prince William’s likely continuation of that approach, has effectively closed the door on any royal role for the York sisters. Even before Ferguson’s latest scandal, the future for Beatrice and Eugenie in terms of royal engagements was already slim.
Furthermore, both Beatrice and Eugenie have carved out lives that suit their personal interests, with neither showing any significant desire to take on a full-time royal role. While they have made occasional public appearances and supported various charitable causes, there is little indication that they are yearning for a schedule packed with official duties. Both have been able to focus on personal ventures, creating lives outside the royal spotlight, and neither has appeared to push for the level of engagement required of working royals.
In many ways, the demands placed on royal family members in the past, particularly during the 1960s, 70s, and 80s when members of the royal family were seen at events daily, are no longer a viable expectation. The landscape of the royal family has changed dramatically, with a far more streamlined and focused group of royals at the helm. In this new era, it’s clear that Beatrice and Eugenie, along with their cousins, are not part of the core group of working royals.
While the departure of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex left a gap in the roster of working royals, the response has been to increase the duties of royals who were already active in official capacities, such as Edward and Sophie. The York sisters, meanwhile, have remained outside this redefined structure, and it’s highly unlikely that they will ever step into full working royal roles. Even the recent scandal involving their mother, Sarah Ferguson, is unlikely to alter this trajectory; their royal roles were likely decided long before the email controversy resurfaced.
In the end, the royal family’s future is centered around a small, focused group of individuals, and Beatrice and Eugenie were never truly destined for a public royal role. The monarchy’s shift towards centralization and a focus on key global issues has meant that the York sisters were always more likely to remain on the sidelines, where they can lead fulfilling personal lives without the constraints of royal duties.
Leave a Reply