WHAT IF: KING CHARLES AND PRINCESS ANNE MOVED TO NEUTRALIZE MEGHAN MARKLE’S INFLUENCE BEHIND CLOSED DOORS?
In a constructed scenario now being modeled by royal analysts, a chain of private meetings is imagined in which King Charles III and Princess Anne decide that Meghan Markle’s continued influence — narrative, symbolic and media-based — must be formally curtailed to protect what they see as the monarchy’s core identity.
Under this dramatized lens, the tension is not personal but structural: senior royals, believing the institution has been dragged into a personality-driven age, resolve to reassert hierarchy and boundary. The “it’s over” framing in this scenario refers not to relationships, but to a phase — the period in which Meghan’s choices in media and messaging could ripple across the institution unchecked.
The fictional mechanics of the plan
In this “what-if” treatment, insiders depict a two-track strategy:
Optics quarantine — sharply limiting references, participation, or narrative framing that could cast Meghan as an active royal actor in absentia
Internal realignment — positioning Anne as a moral anchor and Catherine as the visible continuity figurehead to pull public legitimacy away from Sussex-driven storylines
Debate within the scenario
The fictional move ignites the same split that defines the real modern monarchy:
— One camp would praise it as a restoration of order and the end of what they view as performative disruption
— The other would read it as institutional retaliation against a woman who refused obedience
The “sealed room” question
Because this is rendered as a behind-doors operation, the crux of the narrative shifts to motive:
Is the intent to punish a dissident — or to prevent a precedent?
In this dramatized world, Anne and Charles are less waging a fight with a person than sealing off a future in which royals act as free agents to global audiences beyond the Crown’s control.
The scenario leaves its question intentionally open:
If the monarchy decided Meghan’s influence had to be ended to secure the future — how much of that decision would the public ever be allowed to see?
Leave a Reply