Bullet from the Roof: Who Ordered the Assassination of Charlie Kirk – a Single Extremist or a Deep State?
OREM, Utah – On a fateful Wednesday afternoon, Utah Valley University was rocked by screams, flashing cameras, and… a cold bullet that pierced the neck of Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, just as he was smiling and handing out hats to the crowd. In just a few seconds, the “American Comeback Tour” event became a war zone between reality and conspiracy theories.
According to initial reports from authorities, at 11:52 a.m., a young man dressed in black, identified as Tyler Robinson, entered the campus. Beau Mason, commissioner of the Utah Department of Public Safety, described in detail: “We watched him move from the stairs to the roof of the building, ready to shoot.” Several witnesses reported seeing an unusual figure on the roof, but no one thought it was an immediate threat.
Horrifying scene in 9 seconds
At 12:23, while Charlie Kirk was answering questions from the audience, an explosion rang out. Smoke billowed, students screamed, and ran away. Security cameras recorded this moment, but strangely, some angles… lost signal just minutes before the shooting. An anonymous source in the FBI admitted: “This coincidence is suspicious, it cannot be ignored.”
One stream of opinion believes that Tyler Robinson is an extremist individual who planned to kill Charlie after political disagreements. The creepy text message allegedly from Robinson revealed: “I had the chance to take out Kirk and I will.” According to court records, Robinson also discussed with his partner and roommate to hide the gun, delete the text messages, proving a carefully prepared scenario.
Opposing streams of opinion: Exaggeration or real conspiracy?
However, many analysts warn, not all is as it seems. Some experts say that “social media, the press, and unverified sources” have exaggerated the details of the incident, turning an extreme individual act into a full-blown conspiracy. “We need to distinguish between facts and fear mongering for views,” one freelance journalist commented.
Meanwhile, investigations have revealed some hard-to-believe details: Robinson attended Utah State University, was exposed to a politically active environment, and is believed to have turned to extremist views over the past year. Family and friends say he became radicalized, hating conservative views. Some even question: Was Robinson just a “puppet” in some elaborate scheme?
The emergence of a “hidden hand”
Some anonymous law enforcement sources suggest that a more sophisticated network may exist. “We found signs of a change of clothing, rapid movement, disabled electronics,” the source said. These details have raised the possibility of outside help, an organization that wants to sow political chaos, or even control public opinion after the assassination.
Police and the FBI are still collecting evidence, including footprints, handprints, and video from the surrounding areas. Tyler Robinson is currently in custody, facing charges of first-degree murder, obstruction of justice, and witness tampering. His family said they persuaded Robinson to surrender to avoid violence, but they also acknowledged he had shown signs of mental instability.
National and international reaction
President Donald Trump called Charlie Kirk “great and legendary,” while Utah residents were still reeling. Social media was abuzz with rumors, from conspiracy theories about a “hidden hand” to the idea that this was an individual extremist. Political analysts warn that the incident could become a catalyst for heated debates, increasing polarization in society.
Some people also emphasize that the sniper shooting at a university is not just a personal crime, but could be a message to politicians, the media and the public: “Be prepared, anyone can be a target.” On the contrary, other observers advise calm, emphasizing that many details are exaggerated to create drama and shock sensation, not reflecting the whole truth.
Leave a Reply