You are here: Home/Uncategorized/ Trump’s lead prosecutor faces a brutal courtroom setback after a surprising admission that analysts say could weaken the case against James Comey.AT
Trump’s lead prosecutor faces a brutal courtroom setback after a surprising admission that analysts say could weaken the case against James Comey.AT
TRUMP’S INCOMPETENT PROSECUTOR JUST HUMILIATED HIM IN COURT THE ADMISSION THAT COULD DESTROY THE CASE AGAINST JAMES COMEY
When Trump’s hand-picked lead prosecutor stepped into the courtroom Monday morning, her team expected another procedural hearing — nothing dramatic, nothing dangerous.
Instead, what unfolded became a catastrophic legal disaster that may not only collapse the indictment against Former FBI Director James Comey but also deal one of the most humiliating blows to Donald Trump’s already battered legal reputation.
The moment came quietly. Embarrassingly quietly.
As the prosecutor attempted to defend the validity of the grand jury proceedings, Judge Richard Halden asked a simple, almost routine question:
“Did the grand jury see the full final indictment before they voted to approve it?”
Her answer — hesitant, stumbling — instantly changed the direction of the case.
“No, Your Honor… they were shown portions… summaries… but not the full two-count indictment in its final form.”
Gasps rippled across the courtroom. The judge froze. Defense attorneys immediately scribbled notes. Even the stenographer lifted her head.
This was not a mistake. This was a confession.
And within seconds, Trump’s Justice Department was plunged into a crisis that legal experts are calling “one of the most incompetent prosecutorial failures in a major federal case in years.”
THE UNFORGIVABLE PROSECUTORIAL ERROR
Under federal law, a grand jury must be shown — or at minimum, accurately presented with — the charges they are being asked to approve. This foundational requirement ensures that:
• Jurors understand the accusations • They evaluate the evidence fairly • The prosecutor does not manipulate them
But in this case, the lead prosecutor admitted that the grand jury:
• Never saw the final indictment • Never reviewed the exact charges now filed against Comey • Never received the legally required documentation
Instead, they were given “summaries” and “preliminary drafts,” which were not the same as the final two-count indictment.
Judge Halden immediately understood the implications.
This wasn’t just sloppy. This wasn’t just rushed.
It was legally fatal.
THE COURTROOM REACTS — AND TRUMP TAKES A HIT
James Comey’s defense team seized on the admission instantly.
Lead attorney Marcia Lattimore rose from her seat and delivered what many observers described as a “devastating dismantling” of the prosecution.
“Your Honor, the law is clear. A grand jury cannot approve what it has not seen. What we have here is not a defect — it is the absence of a valid indictment.”
The judge didn’t interrupt her. Trump’s prosecutor looked pale. The courtroom could feel the momentum shifting — fast, hard, and uncontrollably.
Legal analysts say this type of prosecutorial error is not just rare, but stunningly amateurish.
Former federal prosecutor Neal Browning explained:
“This is Prosecution 101. You don’t ask a grand jury to vote on charges they’ve never reviewed. If this holds, the indictment collapses — instantly.”
But the impact of the admission goes far beyond the legal technicality.
It directly undermines the credibility of Trump’s Justice Department, which has been under scrutiny for political motives, questionable appointments, and legal overreach.
Today’s mistake did more than embarrass Trump. It validated every critic who has said the case against Comey was built on unstable ground.
HOW DID THIS HAPPEN? INSIDE A BROKEN PROSECUTION TEAM
Multiple factors appear to have contributed:
1. An inexperienced lead prosecutor
The attorney, appointed under Trump’s direction, has only limited experience in federal criminal trials.
She was quickly elevated to her role despite never handling a case of this magnitude.
Legal insiders say she was “politically loyal, not professionally qualified.”
2. A chaotic, rushed process
Conflicting memos, last-minute revisions, and intense political pressure led to:
• Draft indictments • Revised versions • Confusing internal communication
In this confusion, no one ensured the grand jury reviewed the final document.
3. Trump’s direct involvement
Several DOJ staffers anonymously reported that Trump himself pressured the team to “move fast,” “keep Comey on the defensive,” and “push the indictment through.”
Such pressure may have contributed to careless — and now catastrophic — errors.
THE JUDGE’S RESPONSE — A WARNING SHOT TO TRUMP’S DOJ
Judge Halden’s reaction was icy and sharp.
“This is not a minor flaw,” he said. “This is a structural failure of the indictment process.”
He then delivered a line that will likely be quoted for years:
“If the grand jury did not approve the charges as written, then no indictment exists.”
The courtroom felt the weight of every syllable.
The judge has not yet dismissed the case, but he has signaled that a dismissal is now firmly on the table — and that the prosecution must explain, within seven days, how they allowed this failure to happen.
Observers say his tone suggested he already knows the explanation will not be good enough.
COMEY’S LEGAL TEAM CELEBRATES — BUT QUIETLY
Outside the courthouse, Comey’s attorneys did not display triumph. Their demeanor was calm, controlled, almost cautious — perhaps recognizing that the case is far from over.
But one comment from a defense associate summed up the mood:
“We didn’t beat them. They beat themselves.”
TRUMP’S COUNTER-STRATEGY IMPLODES
Political advisers within Trump’s orbit reportedly panicked as news of the courtroom disaster reached them.
One senior adviser described the moment succinctly:
“This was supposed to be the cleanest, simplest case. Instead, we walked into court and shot ourselves in the foot.”
Others warned that Trump’s enemies — both political and legal — will now use this failure to argue that:
• The DOJ under Trump is incompetent • The prosecution was politically motivated • The entire case is illegitimate • Trump’s hand-picked prosecutors cannot be trusted
This narrative is already spreading.
Even conservative legal commentators are stunned.
Former Bush White House lawyer J. Morgan Tate said:
“No competent prosecutor makes this mistake. It’s embarrassing — and devastating.”
WHAT HAPPENS TO THE INDICTMENT NOW?
Several outcomes are possible:
1. Immediate dismissal of all charges
If the judge concludes the process was invalid, the indictment collapses completely.
2. Re-submission to a new grand jury
The DOJ could attempt to restart — but this would appear desperate and politically compromised.
3. Formal sanctions against the prosecutor
The judge could impose disciplinary actions for violating basic federal procedures.
4. Investigation into DOJ misconduct
This is the nightmare scenario for Trump’s legal team.
THE SCANDAL SPREADS — COULD THIS BRING DOWN MORE THAN JUST A CASE?
Legal experts warn that this blunder opens the door to broader inquiries:
• Was the prosecution team pressured politically? • Why were drafts and summaries used instead of the real indictment? • Did DOJ leaders knowingly allow a defective process? • Was the goal to target Comey regardless of legal sufficiency?
If these questions lead to formal oversight or a special investigation, the consequences could reach far beyond this courtroom.
A collapsed prosecution doesn’t just free Comey. It exposes the entire legal strategy behind Trump’s effort to punish political opponents.
THE PUBLIC REACTION — HUMILIATION FOR TRUMP
Within hours, social media exploded.
Headlines framed the event as:
• “A self-inflicted wound” • “Amateur hour at DOJ” • “A humiliation for Trump’s legal machine” • “Proof the Comey case is a political stunt gone wrong”
Even some conservative commentators admitted privately that the mistake was “unrecoverable.”
CONCLUSION: THE MOMENT EVERYTHING CHANGED
The Comey case was supposed to showcase strength — Trump’s decisive willingness to pursue those he believes wronged him.
Instead, it showcased weakness: a prosecution team that did not understand — or did not respect — the basic mechanics of federal law.
The prosecutor’s admission was more than an error. It was a confession that the foundation of the case is cracked beyond repair.
Judge Halden’s next ruling may formally collapse the indictment. But in the court of public opinion, the damage is already done.
Trump wanted a victory. What he got was a humiliation.
And the entire nation watched it happen — in real time.
Leave a Reply