💥 BREAKING NEWS: Federal judge signals Trump official could face criminal contempt as deportation flights defied court order ⚡NN

Two hundred Venezuelan migrants. Two planes. A federal judge’s order to stop everything. And a Trump administration that, according to court records, didn’t just push the limits — it may have bulldozed straight through them.

This story isn’t slowing down. In fact, it’s heading into a courtroom showdown that could end with something unthinkable in modern U.S. politics: a top Trump official facing a serious criminal contempt referral.

The case that won’t die

Back on March 15, 2025, Chief Judge James Boasberg of the D.C. federal court issued an emergency order after the ACLU raced into court. The government had begun removing roughly 200 Venezuelans to El Salvador’s notorious CECOT mega-prison, allegedly using the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 — a wartime law invoked only a handful of times in U.S. history. CBS News

Boasberg’s order was blunt: turn the planes around. Don’t land. Don’t transfer custody. Stop.

But the flights kept going.

That’s the core of what has turned a chaotic immigration fight into a possible criminal contempt time bomb. Boasberg has already found probable cause that his order was violated — meaning he sees enough evidence to believe contempt likely happened. news.bloomberglaw.com+1

The spotlight shifts to Kristi Noem

For months, the case was tangled in appeals. Now it’s back on Boasberg’s desk, and the finger is pointing upward. The administration recently submitted declarations naming Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem as the official who authorized continuing the operation after the court order. news.bloomberglaw.com

Noem responded with a short affidavit basically arguing she didn’t fully understand what was happening in real time. Boasberg wasn’t impressed. In a new order, he described the government’s submissions as “cursory” and said they don’t yet give him enough to decide whether Noem’s actions were a willful violation — the key threshold for criminal contempt. news.bloomberglaw.com

So for now, he’s holding off on a formal criminal referral. But his message was razor-thin: a referral is “premature,” not impossible.

Translation: you’re not safe — you’re just not convicted yet.

December 15: the hearing that could explode

Boasberg just scheduled the next chapter for December 15, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. He’s calling live witnesses to reconstruct what happened inside the government when the planes were ordered to fly anyway. news.bloomberglaw.com

Two names matter most:

1. Arez Ruvani (also spelled Erez Reuveni) — a former DOJ immigration lawyer fired after he became a whistleblower. Ruvani told Congress that senior DOJ leadership expected court resistance and discussed ignoring it. news.bloomberglaw.com
2. Drew Ensign — the DOJ lawyer who was in court when Boasberg issued the order. The judge wants to know what Ensign knew, when he knew it, and why the planes reportedly kept moving. news.bloomberglaw.com

This is not a routine hearing. Boasberg is preparing for a full factual autopsy, with both sides cross-examining witnesses under oath. If testimony shows the administration knowingly defied the court, the “premature” criminal referral could turn very real, very fast. news.bloomberglaw.com

The deeper earthquake

This standoff is happening in a climate already dripping with institutional tension. Earlier this year, Trump publicly attacked Boasberg over the case and even demanded his impeachment — only to be slapped down in a rare rebuke by Chief Justice John Roberts, who warned that impeachment is not a response to disliking court rulings. PBS+1

So the stakes aren’t just about one deportation operation. They’re about whether the executive branch can treat federal court orders as optional — and what happens if a judge decides they didn’t just test the line, but crossed it on purpose.

Right now, the Trump administration is walking into December with a judge who’s done being brushed off, a whistleblower ready to testify, and a case that looks less like a policy fight and more like a potential criminal confrontation at the highest levels of power.

If Boasberg decides the defiance was willful, someone may be staring down a courtroom reality that no press spin can erase.