Federal prosecutors are supposed to be the most serious people in the justice system. Under Donald Trump, theyâve become something closer to legal squatters.

Across multiple federal districts, judges are firing Trump-appointed âinterimâ U.S. Attorneys â and those same lawyers are refusing to leave, still signing their names on official documents as if nothing happened. What should be a straightforward constitutional process has turned into a slow-motion coup inside the Department of Justice.
Hereâs how itâs supposed to work:
When an interim U.S. Attorneyâs 120-day term expires, federal judges can either extend it or replace them. If a judge says youâre done, youâre done. You pack your box, hand in your badge, and walk out.
Under Trumpâs regime? They just⊠stay.
Judges in multiple districts have now told Trumpâs handpicked loyalists:
You are not the United States Attorney. You were never properly appointed. You do not have the authority you claim.
And yet, those same loyalists keep acting as if theyâre still in charge.
In the Eastern District of Virginia, Trump ally Lindsey Halligan was already tossed off the politically-motivated cases against James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. A judge ruled she was never lawfully in the job â not confirmed by the Senate, not properly approved by the local judges.
That should have been the end of the story.
Instead, Halligan is still signing court documents as âUnited States Attorney,â not even bothering to call herself âinterim.â Judges are literally scratching her name off filings, adding asterisks, and telling line prosecutors in open court:
âShe is not the U.S. Attorney. Stop putting her name on pleadings.â
Those rank-and-file prosecutors are stuck in the middle, forced to admit theyâre being ordered by Main Justice in Washington to keep using Halliganâs name, even after sheâs been declared a legal nullity.
This isnât a paperwork error. This is a deliberate act of defiance against the courts.
And itâs not just Virginia.

In New Jersey, Trump loyalist Alina Habba pulled the same move â styling herself as U.S. Attorney despite lacking any meaningful federal prosecutorial experience. Judges removed her. Trumpâs team tried to get around it by having her fire the person the judges did approve (the First Assistant U.S. Attorney), then claim sheâd âinheritedâ the job.
The appeals courtâs response was basically:
Absolutely not. You canât steal someone elseâs job after the court fires you.
Former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman, who ran the Western District of Pennsylvania, didnât sugar coat what this means: the DOJ under Trump looks like a âseceding enclaveâ running its own fake justice system â ignoring statutes, ignoring appointments rules, and openly flipping off the courts.
The stakes arenât abstract. This isnât just about Comey, Letitia James, or other high-profile targets of Trumpâs revenge fantasies. Every single ordinary criminal case handled under these fake U.S. Attorneys is now vulnerable:
- Defense lawyers can argue indictments were tainted because they were supervised and signed by people with no lawful authority.
- Judges are being forced into open confrontation with âunqualified, unlawfulâ leaders in their own courthouses.
- The entire credibility of DOJ in those districts is collapsing.
Litman calls it âbreathtakingly lawless.â The judges say these people are fired. Trumpâs DOJ replies, essentially: You didnât say we had to stop pretending they have the job.
In Halliganâs case, DOJâs legal theory is so absurd it borders on parody:
Yes, sheâs been ruled unqualified. Yes, she was unlawfully appointed. But the order didnât explicitly say she had to take her name off the letterhead â so theyâre keeping her there anyway.
In Habbaâs case, the logic is even worse. After judges installed the First Assistant to lead the office, Trumpâs people had her fired and claimed that meant the courtâs authority magically transferred to Habba. Judges had to explain, like exasperated parents talking to a toddler, that you cannot fire your way back into a job the court already took from you.
Whatâs the endgame here?
Itâs not about competence. Itâs not about public safety. Itâs not even about winning cases. Itâs about one thing: loyalty to Donald Trump at all costs.

Trump, Pam Bondi, Todd Blanche, and the rest of his inner circle would rather jeopardize every legitimate case in those districts than surrender control of the top job to someone they donât own. Theyâre willing to alienate every judge, risk dismissals, and tank prosecutions, just to prove that no one â not even the courts â can tell them whoâs in charge.
This is what happens when you treat the Department of Justice like a family law firm and the U.S. Attorneyâs Office like a political cosplay stage. You get squatters at the top, chaos in the middle, and a justice system that looks less like a republic and more like a pretend kingdom inside a federal courthouse.
And while Trumpâs fake prosecutors cling to titles they donât legally hold, real Americans are left wondering a terrifying question:
If the people signing your indictment arenât even lawfully in officeâŠ
What else has this regime been faking?
Leave a Reply